Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)

Positive revenue growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.

Positive EBIT growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Positive operating income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.

Positive net income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

Share reduction while MU is at 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.

Reduced diluted shares while MU is at 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.

Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.

Positive OCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.

Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.

Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.

10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MU's 89.33%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.

5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 21.92%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.

Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.

Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.

Positive growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.

Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.

Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.

Dividend/share CAGR of 417.19% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.

Dividend/share CAGR of 423.04% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.

3Y dividend/share CAGR of 262.50% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.

Our AR growth while MU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.

Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.

Positive BV/share change while MU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

We expand SG&A while MU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.