PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.75%
Negative revenue growth while MU stands at 8.96%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-8.29%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-0.24%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
0.24%
Positive operating income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
9.66%
Positive net income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
11.27%
Positive EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
8.45%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.01%
Share reduction while MU is at 29.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.59%
Reduced diluted shares while MU is at 8.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
8.09%
Dividend growth of 8.09% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-6.68%
Negative OCF growth while MU is at 21.15%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
0.76%
Positive FCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
72.41%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
34.31%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 12.25%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
16.04%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to MU's 16.90%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
177.75%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
85.39%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of MU's 100.38%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
1.19%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 403.96%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
120.11%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
96.83%
Below 50% of MU's 349.39%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
46.06%
Below 50% of MU's 245.85%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
22.64%
Positive growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
19.66%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
22.49%
Positive short-term equity growth while MU is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
511.63%
Dividend/share CAGR of 511.63% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
336.24%
Dividend/share CAGR of 336.24% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
29.79%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 29.79% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-13.45%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
6.74%
Inventory growth well above MU's 1.32%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
5.95%
Asset growth above 1.5x MU's 2.20%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
5.84%
Positive BV/share change while MU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.00%
Our R&D shrinks while MU invests at 38.73%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-0.26%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.