PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.65%
Revenue growth under 50% of MU's 5.08%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
5.39%
Positive gross profit growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
44.97%
Positive EBIT growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
40.47%
Positive operating income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
75.78%
Positive net income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
78.95%
Positive EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
76.32%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.88%
Share reduction while MU is at 0.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.13%
Reduced diluted shares while MU is at 0.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.37%
Dividend growth of 0.37% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
78.07%
OCF growth above 1.5x MU's 19.51%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
98.87%
FCF growth 75-90% of MU's 124.18%. Bill Ackman might push for improved capital allocation or operational changes to match the competitor.
128.08%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 71.81%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
16.05%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MU's 30.89%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
30.73%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 61.77%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
221.77%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 136.70%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-1.55%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is at 594.73%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
60.07%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 274.24%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
530.73%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
26.69%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
61.84%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 9.10%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
55.49%
Positive growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
28.39%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
34.19%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to MU's 36.99%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
707.91%
Dividend/share CAGR of 707.91% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
113.40%
Dividend/share CAGR of 113.40% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
56.13%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 56.13% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-0.37%
Firm’s AR is declining while MU shows 7.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-1.96%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
5.09%
Asset growth above 1.5x MU's 1.25%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.10%
Positive BV/share change while MU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
20.99%
Debt growth far above MU's 38.14%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-3.54%
Our R&D shrinks while MU invests at 4.05%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-0.66%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.