PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.12%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-16.95%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-79.40%
Negative EBIT growth while MU is at 26.70%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-83.45%
Negative operating income growth while MU is at 26.70%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-66.33%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 24.06%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-66.18%
Negative EPS growth while MU is at 25.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-65.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MU is at 25.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-1.50%
Share reduction while MU is at 2.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.49%
Reduced diluted shares while MU is at 2.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
22.98%
Dividend growth of 22.98% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-9.73%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-5.99%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
103.30%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 56.56%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
3.27%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of MU's 3.89%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
10.62%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 25.60%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
113.57%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of MU's 214.72%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
-6.01%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is at 137.67%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
20.95%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 5.01%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
165.64%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 75.28% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-56.90%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-55.02%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
49.55%
Positive growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
35.46%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
25.81%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MU's 37.83%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
856.00%
Dividend/share CAGR of 856.00% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
109.92%
Dividend/share CAGR of 109.92% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
76.00%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 76.00% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-24.21%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-4.92%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-2.19%
Negative asset growth while MU invests at 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-2.41%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-0.07%
We’re deleveraging while MU stands at 2.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-8.21%
Our R&D shrinks while MU invests at 1.73%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-5.08%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.