PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.77%
Negative revenue growth while MU stands at 8.25%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-14.16%
Negative gross profit growth while MU is at 9.06%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-21.48%
Negative EBIT growth while MU is at 10.73%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-21.73%
Negative operating income growth while MU is at 10.73%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-21.08%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 13.13%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-19.88%
Negative EPS growth while MU is at 13.03%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-19.62%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MU is at 14.84%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-1.65%
Share reduction while MU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.92%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
24.31%
Dividend growth of 24.31% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
1.85%
OCF growth under 50% of MU's 20.98%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
4.95%
FCF growth under 50% of MU's 56.46%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
100.57%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 288.38%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
39.89%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 164.65%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
23.68%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 114.42%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
157.89%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 1314.51%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
103.87%
Below 50% of MU's 540.93%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
59.17%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 357.73%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
1456.48%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 938.32% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
176.30%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MU's 125.74%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
57.27%
Below 50% of MU's 739.82%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
29.63%
Below 50% of MU's 248.54%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-5.16%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while MU is at 214.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-4.04%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MU is at 140.09%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
601.64%
Dividend/share CAGR of 601.64% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
157.27%
Dividend/share CAGR of 157.27% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
102.33%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 102.33% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-23.85%
Firm’s AR is declining while MU shows 11.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
4.77%
Inventory growth well above MU's 6.71%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-7.73%
Negative asset growth while MU invests at 3.66%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-13.04%
We have a declining book value while MU shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
0.02%
We have some new debt while MU reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
2.56%
We increase R&D while MU cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
4.55%
SG&A growth well above MU's 1.90%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.