PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.81%
Positive revenue growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
3.64%
Positive gross profit growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
4.17%
Positive EBIT growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
5.51%
Positive operating income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
9.20%
Positive net income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
10.14%
Positive EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
9.56%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.21%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.31%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.08%
Dividend growth of 0.08% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
10.91%
Positive OCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
21.89%
Positive FCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
75.75%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 218.63%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
22.11%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MU's 16.11%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
9.87%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 53.08%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
220.59%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 1221.42%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
63.29%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of MU's 79.92%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
50.95%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 545.71%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
255.52%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of MU's 313.19%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
95.58%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 0.63%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
57.62%
Below 50% of MU's 461.99%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
27.78%
Below 50% of MU's 453.51%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-2.72%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while MU is at 243.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-6.47%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MU is at 168.55%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
601.27%
Dividend/share CAGR of 601.27% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
156.24%
Dividend/share CAGR of 156.24% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
102.09%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 102.09% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-5.43%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-1.88%
Inventory is declining while MU stands at 11.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
3.50%
Positive asset growth while MU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
6.11%
BV/share growth of 6.11% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
-0.19%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-2.82%
Our R&D shrinks while MU invests at 0.83%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-5.00%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.