PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.78%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of MU's 8.02%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
10.01%
Positive gross profit growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
15.16%
Positive EBIT growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
14.13%
Positive operating income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
10.15%
Positive net income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
10.00%
Positive EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
9.63%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.11%
Share reduction more than 1.5x MU's 0.45%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.21%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x MU's 0.79%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
0.10%
Dividend growth of 0.10% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
14.65%
OCF growth under 50% of MU's 55.41%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
12.52%
FCF growth under 50% of MU's 105.06%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
65.88%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 143.76%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
52.11%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MU's 96.60%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
20.69%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
320.99%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MU's 233.37%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
115.68%
Below 50% of MU's 270.61%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
22.95%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
259.89%
Below 50% of MU's 638.87%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
156.30%
Below 50% of MU's 675.03%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
45.48%
Positive short-term CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
28.12%
Below 50% of MU's 323.94%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
21.70%
Below 50% of MU's 206.70%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
11.02%
Below 50% of MU's 63.33%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
686.53%
Dividend/share CAGR of 686.53% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
168.06%
Dividend/share CAGR of 168.06% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
64.54%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 64.54% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
0.44%
Our AR growth while MU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-1.80%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
4.91%
Asset growth above 1.5x MU's 0.83%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
9.59%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MU's 1.44%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
0.02%
We have some new debt while MU reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
1.30%
We increase R&D while MU cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.