PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.51%
Positive revenue growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
2.75%
Positive gross profit growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
2.63%
Positive EBIT growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2.40%
Positive operating income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
2.95%
Positive net income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
3.03%
Positive EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
3.96%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.11%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.21%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.20%
Dividend growth of 0.20% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-9.04%
Negative OCF growth while MU is at 1.39%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
58.23%
Positive FCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
94.62%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 222.57%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
55.90%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MU's 79.96%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
38.84%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
491.32%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of MU's 754.89%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
191.60%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of MU's 221.62%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
97.03%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
928.53%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of MU's 1181.52%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
138.70%
Below 50% of MU's 1090.67%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
83.99%
Positive short-term CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
56.79%
Below 50% of MU's 386.80%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
42.46%
Below 50% of MU's 246.32%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
67.39%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 37.24%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
575.06%
Dividend/share CAGR of 575.06% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
129.88%
Dividend/share CAGR of 129.88% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
49.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 49.37% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
5.53%
Our AR growth while MU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
7.85%
Inventory growth well above MU's 7.58%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.43%
Asset growth at 50-75% of MU's 4.07%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
5.24%
Similar to MU's 4.87%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-5.65%
We’re deleveraging while MU stands at 3.64%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
0.51%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MU's 0.99%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
4.46%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MU's 9.75%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.