205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17.46%
Revenue growth above 1.5x NXPI's 3.21%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
25.99%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x NXPI's 0.13%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
51.31%
Positive EBIT growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
54.85%
Positive operating income growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
29.41%
Positive net income growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
31.25%
Positive EPS growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
25.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.26%
Slight or no buybacks while NXPI is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.57%
Slight or no buyback while NXPI is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
2.76%
Dividend growth above 1.5x NXPI's 0.12%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
42.40%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x NXPI's 37.88%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
260.00%
FCF growth above 1.5x NXPI's 94.26%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
18.29%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 79.10%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-12.42%
Negative 5Y CAGR while NXPI stands at 77.31%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-5.56%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.54%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while NXPI is at 107.18%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
77.15%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
150.39%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 36.73% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
64.61%
Below 50% of NXPI's 328.95%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
310.75%
Positive short-term CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
130.52%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 18.89%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
48.58%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x NXPI's 42.98%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
88.55%
Dividend/share CAGR of 88.55% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
83.56%
Below 50% of NXPI's 169.49%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
-0.18%
Negative near-term dividend growth while NXPI invests at 20.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
18.90%
AR growth well above NXPI's 1.04%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
7.49%
Inventory growth well above NXPI's 0.47%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-0.61%
Negative asset growth while NXPI invests at 0.28%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.37%
Under 50% of NXPI's 3.20%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-2.08%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
17.36%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. NXPI's 4.75%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
4.02%
We expand SG&A while NXPI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.