205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.66%
Revenue growth above 1.5x NXPI's 0.34%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
6.29%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of NXPI's 8.91%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
8.23%
Positive EBIT growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
8.57%
Positive operating income growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
0.46%
Net income growth under 50% of NXPI's 8.24%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.72%
Share reduction while NXPI is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.11%
Reduced diluted shares while NXPI is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.73%
Dividend growth of 0.73% while NXPI is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-29.07%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-13.10%
Negative FCF growth while NXPI is at 20.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
53.66%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of NXPI's 65.95%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
48.77%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of NXPI's 65.95%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
17.46%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 65.95%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
133.79%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x NXPI's 95.92%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
87.28%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to NXPI's 95.92%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
49.88%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of NXPI's 95.92%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
106.89%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 40.41% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
120.86%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 40.41%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
49.13%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x NXPI's 40.41%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
15.89%
Equity/share CAGR of 15.89% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
13.63%
Equity/share CAGR of 13.63% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
1.63%
Equity/share CAGR of 1.63% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
463.52%
Dividend/share CAGR of 463.52% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
378.03%
Dividend/share CAGR of 378.03% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
200.44%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 200.44% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
19.50%
AR growth well above NXPI's 16.34%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
6.16%
We show growth while NXPI is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.07%
Positive asset growth while NXPI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.59%
Positive BV/share change while NXPI is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.52%
We increase R&D while NXPI cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
3.16%
We expand SG&A while NXPI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.