PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.39%
Negative revenue growth while ON stands at 1.59%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-4.39%
Negative gross profit growth while ON is at 87.85%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
138.19%
EBIT growth similar to ON's 138.01%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
138.19%
Operating income growth similar to ON's 133.71%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
11.04%
Net income growth under 50% of ON's 135.03%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
20.00%
EPS growth under 50% of ON's 135.65%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
20.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of ON's 135.65%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.17%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 71.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
23.17%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x ON's 19.72%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
23.17%
Positive 3Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
732.28%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 245.86% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
732.28%
Below 50% of ON's 12132.26%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
732.28%
Positive short-term CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.