PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.37%
Negative revenue growth while ON stands at 1.59%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-66.16%
Negative gross profit growth while ON is at 87.85%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
12.50%
EBIT growth below 50% of ON's 138.01%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
12.50%
Operating income growth under 50% of ON's 133.71%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
3.57%
Net income growth under 50% of ON's 135.03%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-9.17%
Negative EPS growth while ON is at 135.65%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-9.17%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ON is at 135.65%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-3.70%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-3.70%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
12.88%
Dividend growth of 12.88% while ON is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-90.30%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-135.76%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
38.03%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of ON's 71.75%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
38.03%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 19.72%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
12.06%
Positive 3Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-298.66%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while ON is at 245.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-298.66%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while ON is 12132.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-163.05%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 76.37% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-5.93%
Firm’s AR is declining while ON shows 12.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
2.82%
Inventory growth well above ON's 0.43%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
0.20%
Positive asset growth while ON is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
0.63%
1.25-1.5x ON's 0.51%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
18.67%
Debt growth far above ON's 0.13%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.20%
We cut SG&A while ON invests at 1.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.