PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.77%
Revenue growth under 50% of ON's 1.59%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
3.40%
Gross profit growth under 50% of ON's 87.85%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
45.05%
EBIT growth below 50% of ON's 138.01%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
45.05%
Operating income growth under 50% of ON's 133.71%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
28.03%
Net income growth under 50% of ON's 135.03%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
23.08%
EPS growth under 50% of ON's 135.65%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
23.08%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of ON's 135.65%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-5.09%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-5.09%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-29.19%
Dividend reduction while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-105.00%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
1.87%
Positive FCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
44.13%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of ON's 71.75%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
38.38%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 19.72%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
15.51%
Positive 3Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.91%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while ON is at 245.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-921.03%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while ON is 12132.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-229.33%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
577.65%
Dividend/share CAGR of 577.65% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
527.45%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 527.45% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
9.20%
AR growth well above ON's 12.36%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-1.72%
Inventory is declining while ON stands at 0.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.68%
Positive asset growth while ON is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
15.26%
BV/share growth above 1.5x ON's 0.51%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-8.56%
We’re deleveraging while ON stands at 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.90%
We cut SG&A while ON invests at 1.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.