PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.02%
Revenue growth above 1.5x ON's 1.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
134.81%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x ON's 87.85%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-2.59%
Negative EBIT growth while ON is at 138.01%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-2.59%
Negative operating income growth while ON is at 133.71%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
35.09%
Net income growth under 50% of ON's 135.03%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
25.00%
EPS growth under 50% of ON's 135.65%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of ON's 135.65%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
19.32%
Slight or no buybacks while ON is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
19.32%
Slight or no buyback while ON is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-12.55%
Dividend reduction while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
14.29%
Positive OCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
6.22%
Positive FCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
38.83%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of ON's 71.75%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
13.74%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of ON's 19.72%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
-0.50%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.25%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
258.23%
Similar net income/share CAGR to ON's 245.86%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
-12.15%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while ON is 12132.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
99.65%
Positive short-term CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
15.18%
Below 50% of ON's 411.86%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-0.88%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while ON is at 142.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-27.07%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while ON is at 54.30%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-19.54%
Cut dividends over 10 years while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
48.99%
Dividend/share CAGR of 48.99% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-6.13%
Negative near-term dividend growth while ON invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-12.16%
Firm’s AR is declining while ON shows 12.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-8.02%
Inventory is declining while ON stands at 0.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.07%
Positive asset growth while ON is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-18.17%
We have a declining book value while ON shows 0.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
1.05%
Debt growth far above ON's 0.13%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.30%
SG&A declining or stable vs. ON's 1.18%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.