PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.08%
Revenue growth above 1.5x ON's 1.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
21.62%
Gross profit growth under 50% of ON's 87.85%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
67.84%
EBIT growth below 50% of ON's 138.01%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
67.84%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of ON's 133.71%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
93.02%
Net income growth at 50-75% of ON's 135.03%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
88.89%
EPS growth at 50-75% of ON's 135.65%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
77.78%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of ON's 135.65%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
0.42%
Slight or no buybacks while ON is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.65%
Slight or no buyback while ON is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
2.70%
Dividend growth of 2.70% while ON is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
107.56%
Positive OCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
304.55%
Positive FCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
50.60%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of ON's 71.75%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
12.73%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of ON's 19.72%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
-2.10%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
273.52%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 17.99%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
99.32%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
308.53%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x ON's 245.86%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
184.44%
Below 50% of ON's 12132.26%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
29.95%
Positive short-term CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
87.76%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of ON's 142.72%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
60.15%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x ON's 54.30%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
91.48%
Dividend/share CAGR of 91.48% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
8.57%
Dividend/share CAGR of 8.57% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
86.41%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 86.41% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
4.12%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. ON's 12.36%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
11.16%
Inventory growth well above ON's 0.43%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.34%
Positive asset growth while ON is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.97%
BV/share growth above 1.5x ON's 0.51%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-14.52%
We’re deleveraging while ON stands at 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
17.15%
We increase R&D while ON cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
3.67%
SG&A growth well above ON's 1.18%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.