PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.71%
Positive revenue growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
1.74%
Gross profit growth under 50% of ON's 4.41%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-18.30%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-18.30%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
3.42%
Positive net income growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.42%
Share count expansion well above ON's 0.23%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.42%
Diluted share count expanding well above ON's 0.23%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-3.31%
Dividend reduction while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
92.86%
Positive OCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
237.50%
Positive FCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-16.43%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-2.34%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-18.48%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
23.60%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
10.68%
Positive OCF/share growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-41.48%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-18.75%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
110.54%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-90.75%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
285.08%
Positive growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
66.14%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-14.43%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
15.94%
Dividend/share CAGR of 15.94% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
1.45%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1.45% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
7.83%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 7.83% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
5.49%
AR growth well above ON's 0.62%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
13.38%
Inventory growth well above ON's 5.34%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.66%
Positive asset growth while ON is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-1.39%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-12.30%
We’re deleveraging while ON stands at 1.71%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
3.92%
We increase R&D while ON cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
8.97%
We expand SG&A while ON cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.