PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.37%
Revenue growth above 1.5x QCOM's 0.44%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-7.67%
Negative gross profit growth while QCOM is at 0.44%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-217.14%
Negative EBIT growth while QCOM is at 0.44%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-217.14%
Negative operating income growth while QCOM is at 0.44%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-190.74%
Negative net income growth while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-160.00%
Negative EPS growth while QCOM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-160.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while QCOM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.49%
Share reduction while QCOM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.49%
Reduced diluted shares while QCOM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
402.45%
Dividend growth of 402.45% while QCOM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-59.18%
Negative OCF growth while QCOM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
0.93%
FCF growth of 0.93% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
30.70%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 94.83%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
30.70%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 94.83%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
8.56%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 94.83%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1331.05%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while QCOM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-1331.05%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-271.58%
Negative 3Y CAGR while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
857.05%
Dividend/share CAGR of 857.05% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
857.05%
Dividend/share CAGR of 857.05% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
786.16%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 786.16% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
6.53%
AR growth of 6.53% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-4.17%
Inventory is declining while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.07%
Negative asset growth while QCOM invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-13.85%
We have a declining book value while QCOM shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
19.44%
Debt growth of 19.44% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.77%
SG&A growth of 16.77% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.