PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.08%
Revenue growth under 50% of QCOM's 50.60%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
21.62%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of QCOM's 28.33%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
67.84%
EBIT growth above 1.5x QCOM's 19.38%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
67.84%
Operating income growth above 1.5x QCOM's 19.38%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
93.02%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x QCOM's 83.49%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
88.89%
EPS growth above 1.5x QCOM's 50.00%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
77.78%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x QCOM's 50.00%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.42%
Share reduction more than 1.5x QCOM's 3.06%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.65%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x QCOM's 4.39%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
2.70%
Dividend growth of 2.70% while QCOM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
107.56%
OCF growth above 1.5x QCOM's 58.28%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
304.55%
FCF growth above 1.5x QCOM's 32.76%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
50.60%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 22458.25%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
12.73%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QCOM's 9947.76%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-2.10%
Negative 3Y CAGR while QCOM stands at 5840.65%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
273.52%
Positive OCF/share growth while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
99.32%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while QCOM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
308.53%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 308.53% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
184.44%
Below 50% of QCOM's 6395.35%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
29.95%
Below 50% of QCOM's 1990.43%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
87.76%
Below 50% of QCOM's 5847.14%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
60.15%
Below 50% of QCOM's 2330.48%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
91.48%
Dividend/share CAGR of 91.48% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
8.57%
Dividend/share CAGR of 8.57% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
86.41%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 86.41% while QCOM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
4.12%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. QCOM's 35.93%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
11.16%
We show growth while QCOM is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.34%
Asset growth well under 50% of QCOM's 55.50%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
4.97%
Under 50% of QCOM's 75.68%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-14.52%
We’re deleveraging while QCOM stands at 1.50%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
17.15%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. QCOM's 15.00%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
3.67%
SG&A declining or stable vs. QCOM's 24.87%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.