PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.07%
Positive revenue growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-6.06%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-10.44%
Negative EBIT growth while QRVO is at 810.08%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-10.44%
Negative operating income growth while QRVO is at 6.61%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-4.25%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-4.44%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-2.27%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-1.21%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.72%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.46%
Dividend growth of 0.46% while QRVO is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
102.70%
Positive OCF growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
243.37%
Positive FCF growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
91.91%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to QRVO's 95.48%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
76.29%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x QRVO's 27.97%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
17.50%
Positive 3Y CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
123.71%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x QRVO's 108.03%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
171.96%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x QRVO's 5.08%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-13.46%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
311.00%
Below 50% of QRVO's 1921.69%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
66.06%
Positive 5Y CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
11.12%
Positive short-term CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
100.48%
Positive growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
16.45%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
5.88%
Positive short-term equity growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
361.29%
Dividend/share CAGR of 361.29% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
366.79%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while QRVO is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
652488.96%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 652488.96% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-2.04%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-4.60%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
0.68%
Asset growth at 50-75% of QRVO's 1.09%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
2.34%
50-75% of QRVO's 3.14%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.89%
We increase R&D while QRVO cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-8.88%
We cut SG&A while QRVO invests at 19.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.