PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.45%
Positive revenue growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
11.88%
Positive gross profit growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
20.05%
EBIT growth 50-75% of QRVO's 30.33%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
20.81%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of QRVO's 35.22%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
21.69%
Positive net income growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
22.86%
Positive EPS growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
22.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.60%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.69%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.00%
Dividend growth of 0.00% while QRVO is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
87.79%
Positive OCF growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
100.52%
Positive FCF growth while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
61.16%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
38.87%
Positive 5Y CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
26.13%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 235.26%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
61.31%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x QRVO's 44.83%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
63.85%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x QRVO's 44.83%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
33.59%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of QRVO's 266.53%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
137.49%
Positive 10Y CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
87.46%
Positive 5Y CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
66.91%
Positive short-term CAGR while QRVO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
41.50%
Below 50% of QRVO's 113.79%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
10.21%
Below 50% of QRVO's 113.79%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
12.58%
Below 50% of QRVO's 762.43%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
522.75%
Dividend/share CAGR of 522.75% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
191.83%
Dividend/share CAGR of 191.83% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
66.48%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 66.48% while QRVO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
7.28%
Our AR growth while QRVO is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-2.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.99%
Positive asset growth while QRVO is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.24%
Positive BV/share change while QRVO is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.79%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-5.07%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.