PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.24%
Revenue growth of 2.24% vs. zero growth in Semiconductors. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
47.23%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 4.81%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
83.58%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 26.53%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
83.58%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 26.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
67.24%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 9.30%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
72.41%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 7.18%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
72.41%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 4.65%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
18.75%
Share growth above Semiconductors median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
18.75%
Diluted share change of 18.75% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-13.45%
Dividend cuts while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-62.05%
Negative OCF growth while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-67.65%
Negative FCF growth while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-45.13%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Semiconductors median is 48.08%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-35.18%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Semiconductors median is 3.09%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-24.61%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
1782.46%
OCF/share CAGR of 1782.46% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-18.33%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
14.77%
3Y OCF/share growth of 14.77% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-148.33%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Semiconductors median of -86.31%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-123.65%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Semiconductors median is -94.67%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-112.54%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Semiconductors median is -70.15%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
216.59%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 88.52% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
124.69%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Semiconductors median of 75.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
49.26%
3Y equity/share CAGR near Semiconductors median. Charlie Munger notes it as typical short-term equity expansion in the sector.
-27.60%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-7.16%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-5.66%
Dividend reductions while Semiconductors median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
4.26%
AR growth of 4.26% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
2.26%
We have slight inventory growth while Semiconductors is cutting. Peter Lynch wonders if we expect bigger future sales or if peers see a looming downturn.
-1.53%
Assets shrink while Semiconductors median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-16.01%
Negative BV/share change while Semiconductors median is -0.06%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
0.24%
Debt growth of 0.24% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
1.57%
R&D growth of 1.57% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-11.96%
SG&A decline while Semiconductors grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.