PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.85%
Negative revenue growth while Semiconductors median is -3.40%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-6.35%
Negative gross profit growth while Semiconductors median is -2.82%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-11.23%
Negative EBIT growth while Semiconductors median is -10.38%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-11.23%
Negative operating income growth while Semiconductors median is -10.38%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-22.75%
Negative net income growth while Semiconductors median is -7.70%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-21.74%
Negative EPS growth while Semiconductors median is -2.20%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-23.91%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Semiconductors median is -6.22%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-1.77%
Share reduction while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-2.00%
Diluted share reduction while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
1.80%
Dividend growth of 1.80% while Semiconductors median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-34.44%
Negative OCF growth while Semiconductors median is -26.44%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-40.57%
Negative FCF growth while Semiconductors median is -26.99%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
49.18%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 75-90% of Semiconductors median of 54.80%. John Neff would seek operational improvements to catch up with peers.
130.13%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 67.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
30.62%
3Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Semiconductors median of 22.57%. Mohnish Pabrai would attribute it to strong near-term market positioning.
101.41%
OCF/share CAGR of 101.41% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
146.61%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 12.51%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
69.41%
3Y OCF/share growth of 69.41% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
323.19%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 84.34% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
1889.18%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Semiconductors median of 128.98%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
68.97%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Semiconductors median of 44.07%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
181.93%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 71.20% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
25.48%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 25.48% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
12.20%
3Y equity/share CAGR 50-75% of Semiconductors median. Guy Spier suspects suboptimal short-term capital usage vs. peers.
91.76%
Dividend/share CAGR of 91.76% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
106.54%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 106.54% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
88.39%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 88.39% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-1.01%
AR shrinking while Semiconductors median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-1.95%
Decreasing inventory while Semiconductors is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-1.29%
Assets shrink while Semiconductors median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
1.11%
Near Semiconductors median. Charlie Munger considers it standard net worth compounding for the sector.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.72%
R&D dropping while Semiconductors median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-4.93%
SG&A decline while Semiconductors grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.