PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.49%
Negative revenue growth while Semiconductors median is -0.42%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-2.01%
Negative gross profit growth while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-1.42%
Negative EBIT growth while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
0.44%
Operating income growth of 0.44% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
-4.70%
Negative net income growth while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-4.35%
Negative EPS growth while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-4.35%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.46%
Share reduction while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.54%
Diluted share reduction while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
0.15%
Dividend growth of 0.15% while Semiconductors median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-61.47%
Negative OCF growth while Semiconductors median is -7.70%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-64.74%
Negative FCF growth while Semiconductors median is -3.91%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
62.88%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 28.90%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
68.66%
5Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Semiconductors median of 51.17%. Mohnish Pabrai might attribute the outperformance to scale or brand strength.
-5.06%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
88.46%
OCF/share CAGR of 88.46% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
117.10%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 15.82%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
-3.34%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
112.73%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 58.66% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
3278.82%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Semiconductors median of 105.98%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
-21.06%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Semiconductors median is -14.72%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
40.88%
Equity/share CAGR of 40.88% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
36.00%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Semiconductors median of 3.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
8.43%
3Y equity/share CAGR 75-90% of Semiconductors median. John Neff calls for overhead or margin tweaks to keep pace with peers.
1308.17%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1308.17% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
171.86%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 171.86% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
129.32%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 129.32% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
12.64%
AR growth of 12.64% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-0.98%
Decreasing inventory while Semiconductors is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-0.02%
Assets shrink while Semiconductors median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-1.28%
Negative BV/share change while Semiconductors median is 0.47%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
9.58%
Debt growth of 9.58% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
5.78%
R&D growth of 5.78% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
3.90%
SG&A growth far above Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.