205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.89%
Negative revenue growth while Semiconductors median is 3.44%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-8.13%
Negative gross profit growth while Semiconductors median is 0.43%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-13.11%
Negative EBIT growth while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-12.58%
Negative operating income growth while Semiconductors median is 1.42%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-73.23%
Negative net income growth while Semiconductors median is 0.76%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-72.87%
Negative EPS growth while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-73.02%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Semiconductors median is 0.76%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.30%
Share reduction while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.10%
Diluted share reduction while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
23.81%
Dividend growth of 23.81% while Semiconductors median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
12.02%
OCF growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 5.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see if a superior business model or cost structure drives strong cash generation.
10.55%
FCF growth of 10.55% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
46.89%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Semiconductors median of 35.64%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if consistent reinvestment or product expansions drive this gap.
42.24%
5Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Semiconductors median of 34.23%. Mohnish Pabrai might attribute the outperformance to scale or brand strength.
21.89%
3Y revenue/share growth near Semiconductors median of 23.29%. Charlie Munger would note typical industry expansions over the short term.
88.82%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 16.44% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
100.89%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 50.47%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
61.14%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Semiconductors median of 19.98%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
-36.54%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Semiconductors median of 83.96%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
47.24%
5Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of Semiconductors median. John Neff would encourage better profitability or share buybacks to catch up with peers.
-55.69%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Semiconductors median is 55.62%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
44.34%
Equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Semiconductors median. Mohnish Pabrai might credit disciplined reinvestment or conservative payout ratios for outperformance.
6.56%
Below 50% of Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos suspects weak profitability or questionable capital allocation limiting equity growth.
5.71%
Below 50% of Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos worries about inadequate short-term profitability or repeated asset impairments.
516.71%
Dividend/share CAGR of 516.71% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
193.79%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 193.79% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
82.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 82.37% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-18.91%
AR shrinking while Semiconductors median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
2.57%
Inventory growth far above Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
4.21%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 2.05%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-5.64%
Negative BV/share change while Semiconductors median is 1.24%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
13.79%
Debt growth of 13.79% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
2.93%
R&D growth of 2.93% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-0.73%
SG&A decline while Semiconductors grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.