PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.63%
Negative revenue growth while Semiconductors median is -2.10%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-0.43%
Negative gross profit growth while Semiconductors median is -0.95%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-2.53%
Negative EBIT growth while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-0.40%
Negative operating income growth while Semiconductors median is -0.03%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
9.72%
Net income growth of 9.72% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
10.53%
EPS growth of 10.53% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
10.71%
Diluted EPS growth of 10.71% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-0.21%
Share reduction while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.53%
Diluted share reduction while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
0.21%
Dividend growth of 0.21% while Semiconductors median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-51.48%
Negative OCF growth while Semiconductors median is -4.46%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-56.63%
Negative FCF growth while Semiconductors median is -7.09%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
37.56%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Semiconductors median of 32.86%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if consistent reinvestment or product expansions drive this gap.
18.56%
5Y revenue/share growth near Semiconductors median of 19.18%. Charlie Munger might see typical industry or economic growth patterns.
4.90%
3Y revenue/share growth 75-90% of Semiconductors median of 6.06%. John Neff would see if operational improvements can catch up with peers.
58.74%
OCF/share CAGR of 58.74% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
56.76%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 19.59%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
14.75%
3Y OCF/share growth of 14.75% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
136.30%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 42.45% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
100.76%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Semiconductors median of 4.11%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
26.23%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Semiconductors median of 7.60%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
4.46%
Below 50% of Semiconductors median. Jim Chanos might suspect fundamental issues limiting equity creation over a decade.
-16.33%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Semiconductors median is 32.83%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-22.07%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Semiconductors median is 17.62%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
647.52%
Dividend/share CAGR of 647.52% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
165.01%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 165.01% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
80.30%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 80.30% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
22.53%
AR growth of 22.53% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
0.10%
Inventory reduction well below Semiconductors median. Joel Greenblatt might see a sign of superior operational or supply-chain efficiency.
-4.08%
Assets shrink while Semiconductors median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-12.98%
Negative BV/share change while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
6.76%
Debt growth of 6.76% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-2.33%
R&D dropping while Semiconductors median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
1.21%
Our SG&A slightly up while Semiconductors is cutting. Peter Lynch wonders if we overspend or if the median underinvests in marketing.