PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.18%
Revenue growth 50-75% of Technology median of 8.28%. Guy Spier would worry if the firm is losing market share.
6.18%
Gross profit growth 75-90% of Technology median of 7.98%. John Neff would watch if higher volumes can lift margins eventually.
6.18%
EBIT growth 75-90% of Technology median of 7.66%. John Neff would demand margin improvements or operating leverage to catch up.
6.18%
Operating income growth 75-90% of Technology median of 7.52%. John Neff would want cost optimization to close the gap.
7.37%
Net income growth of 7.37% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
16.67%
EPS growth of 16.67% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
16.67%
Diluted EPS growth of 16.67% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.39%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 75-90% of Technology median of 25.75%. John Neff would seek operational improvements to catch up with peers.
20.39%
5Y revenue/share growth 75-90% of Technology median of 25.75%. John Neff would expect a plan to align with peers or surpass them.
20.39%
3Y revenue/share growth 75-90% of Technology median of 25.75%. John Neff would see if operational improvements can catch up with peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
617.50%
Net income/share CAGR of 617.50% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
617.50%
Net income/share CAGR of 617.50% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
617.50%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 617.50% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.00%
Dividend/share CAGR of 8.00% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
8.00%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 8.00% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
8.00%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 8.00% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.