PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.82%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.82%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
177.57%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.16%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
251.26%
Positive EBIT growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
251.26%
Positive operating income growth while Technology is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
-44.77%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-60.00%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-60.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
19.85%
Share change of 19.85% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
19.85%
Diluted share change of 19.85% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
58.73%
Dividend growth of 58.73% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.52%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 75-90% of Technology median of 45.59%. John Neff would seek operational improvements to catch up with peers.
39.52%
5Y revenue/share growth 75-90% of Technology median of 45.59%. John Neff would expect a plan to align with peers or surpass them.
28.30%
3Y revenue/share growth 75-90% of Technology median of 37.32%. John Neff would see if operational improvements can catch up with peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
179.25%
Net income/share CAGR of 179.25% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
179.25%
Net income/share CAGR of 179.25% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
24.43%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 24.43% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
57.92%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 21.02% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
57.92%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 21.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
32.66%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 18.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
-14.28%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-14.28%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-14.28%
Dividend reductions while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
4.15%
AR growth of 4.15% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-9.16%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
2.64%
Asset growth of 2.64% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-15.87%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
2.31%
Debt growth of 2.31% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.37%
SG&A growth of 0.37% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.