205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.53%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.38%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
-4.88%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-115.79%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-115.79%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-163.64%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-220.00%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-220.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.25%
Share change of 0.25% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.25%
Diluted share change of 0.25% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-4.40%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-112.40%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-101.65%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
29.67%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median of 58.29%. Guy Spier would worry about subpar top-line expansion over the long run.
29.67%
5Y revenue/share growth 50-75% of Technology median of 58.29%. Guy Spier might worry about slower mid-term expansions vs. peers.
12.58%
3Y revenue/share growth below 50% of Technology median of 45.80%. Jim Chanos would suspect a significant short-term erosion in competitiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
92.23%
Net income/share CAGR of 92.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
92.23%
Net income/share CAGR of 92.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
-111.86%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.31%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 56.31% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
19.82%
AR growth of 19.82% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
0.34%
Inventory growth of 0.34% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
2.77%
Asset growth of 2.77% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-1.22%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
16.84%
Debt growth of 16.84% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.94%
SG&A growth of 1.94% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.