PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.12%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.42%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
223.36%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.57%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
31.15%
EBIT growth of 31.15% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
31.15%
Operating income growth of 31.15% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
24.78%
Net income growth of 24.78% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
37.80%
EPS growth of 37.80% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
37.80%
Diluted EPS growth of 37.80% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
14.90%
Share change of 14.90% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
14.90%
Diluted share change of 14.90% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-75.13%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
35000.00%
OCF growth of 35000.00% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
321.90%
FCF growth of 321.90% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
28.18%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Technology median of 65.40%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
17.88%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
-2.29%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 19.80%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-82.91%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-387.17%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-184.17%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
21.11%
Equity/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median. Guy Spier sees subpar expansion vs. peers’ net worth growth.
1.73%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects weak profitability or questionable capital allocation limiting equity growth.
7.09%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos worries about inadequate short-term profitability or repeated asset impairments.
-15.75%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-15.75%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
56.02%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 56.02% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-12.39%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-5.12%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-1.55%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-20.60%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-4.73%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.90%
SG&A growth of 0.90% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.