205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-25.76%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-23.84%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-64.30%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 2.07%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-51.83%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 2.07%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-43.99%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-38.89%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-38.89%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.06%
Share change of 0.06% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-0.20%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-3.09%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-113.53%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-8871.43%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
86.35%
10Y revenue/share CAGR near Technology median of 95.05%. Charlie Munger might expect stable industry trends guiding long-term growth.
35.01%
5Y revenue/share growth 50-75% of Technology median of 55.62%. Guy Spier might worry about slower mid-term expansions vs. peers.
36.76%
3Y revenue/share growth 75-90% of Technology median of 45.10%. John Neff would see if operational improvements can catch up with peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-222.14%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-166.68%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
1100.28%
Net income/share CAGR of 1100.28% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
350.91%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 50.00%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
93.82%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm expansions or margin boosts drive the short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.91%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 53.91% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
101.64%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 101.64% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.40%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 6.40% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
40.10%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 40.10% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-1.06%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
1.41%
Inventory growth of 1.41% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-1.01%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
3.26%
BV/share growth of 3.26% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
37.42%
Debt growth of 37.42% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.28%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.