PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-51.02%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 6.87%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-46.54%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 4.06%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-9.60%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-55.20%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
80.95%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.92%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
81.13%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 8.33%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
81.13%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 11.67%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
0.19%
Share change of 0.19% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.19%
Diluted share change of 0.19% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-3.21%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
316.99%
OCF growth of 316.99% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
184.15%
FCF growth of 184.15% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-28.67%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 61.23%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-39.49%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 41.79%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-62.42%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 25.98%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.38%
OCF/share CAGR of 64.38% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
39.55%
3Y OCF/share growth of 39.55% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-185.06%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
70.38%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 29.42%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
-115.93%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 35.48%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
91.70%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 43.17% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
88.43%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 33.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
33.93%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 21.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
1.01%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1.01% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
19.89%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 19.89% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
42.45%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 42.45% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-17.25%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-29.91%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-2.06%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-0.62%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
6.74%
Debt growth of 6.74% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-55.80%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-10.69%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.