PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.08%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 7.21%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
21.62%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 7.58%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
67.84%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.38%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
67.84%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
93.02%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 7.27%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
88.89%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 6.06%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
77.78%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 6.52%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
0.42%
Share change of 0.42% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.65%
Diluted share change of 0.65% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
2.70%
Dividend growth of 2.70% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
107.56%
OCF growth of 107.56% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
304.55%
FCF growth of 304.55% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
50.60%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median of 69.67%. Guy Spier would worry about subpar top-line expansion over the long run.
12.73%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
-2.10%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 34.98%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
273.52%
OCF/share CAGR of 273.52% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
99.32%
3Y OCF/share growth of 99.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
308.53%
Net income/share CAGR of 308.53% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
184.44%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 54.55%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
29.95%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of Technology median. John Neff would seek cost or revenue improvements to match peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
87.76%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 87.76% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
60.15%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 60.15% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
91.48%
Dividend/share CAGR of 91.48% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
8.57%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 8.57% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
86.41%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 86.41% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
4.12%
AR growth of 4.12% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
11.16%
Inventory growth of 11.16% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
1.34%
Asset growth 50-75% of Technology median. Guy Spier sees potential underinvestment or overcaution vs. peers.
4.97%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-14.52%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
17.15%
R&D growth of 17.15% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
3.67%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.