PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.31%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 2.67%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
2.08%
Gross profit growth near Technology median of 2.31%. Charlie Munger would expect typical industry cost structures.
24.74%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 7.10%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
24.74%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 7.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
587.55%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 7.29%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
558.82%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.78%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
568.75%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 6.67%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
0.89%
Share change of 0.89% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.76%
Diluted share change of 0.76% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-3.88%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-9.44%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-26.97%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
41.78%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median of 80.29%. Guy Spier would worry about subpar top-line expansion over the long run.
2.59%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
-7.06%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 29.11%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.89%
OCF/share CAGR of 37.89% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
31.84%
3Y OCF/share growth of 31.84% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
2355.49%
Net income/share CAGR of 2355.49% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
2232.04%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 60.40%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
780.74%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 34.82%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
146.09%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 146.09% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
111.23%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 111.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
84.04%
Dividend/share CAGR of 84.04% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
8.03%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 8.03% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
39.18%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 39.18% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-0.17%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
2.85%
Inventory growth of 2.85% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
28.62%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.87%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
40.37%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-5.41%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-1.79%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-11.65%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.