PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.88%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 4.11%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-3.46%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 4.66%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-155.87%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-155.87%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-116.65%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 1.61%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-116.07%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.86%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-116.82%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 1.32%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.87%
Share change of 0.87% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-0.32%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
5.33%
Dividend growth of 5.33% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-13.35%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-23.08%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
27.65%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Technology median of 73.58%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
12.23%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
-17.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 26.92%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.67%
OCF/share CAGR of 23.67% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
4.59%
3Y OCF/share growth of 4.59% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-398.64%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-439.94%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 46.75%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-244.17%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 18.42%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
176.53%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 46.30% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
178.97%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 28.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
85.07%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 16.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
93.86%
Dividend/share CAGR of 93.86% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
30.11%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 30.11% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
40.58%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 40.58% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-3.45%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-2.11%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-10.15%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-7.23%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-16.54%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
169.45%
R&D growth of 169.45% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
16.62%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.