205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.93%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-29.32%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
89.00%
EBIT growth of 89.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
89.00%
Operating income growth of 89.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
103.86%
Net income growth of 103.86% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
105.56%
EPS growth of 105.56% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
105.56%
Diluted EPS growth of 105.56% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.07%
Share change of 0.07% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.33%
Diluted share change of 0.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-3.01%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-109.49%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-487.33%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
20.18%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Technology median of 88.44%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
8.64%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
-27.24%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 26.45%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-140.49%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-118.39%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-89.63%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-87.29%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 55.32%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-95.45%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 8.66%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
176.77%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 176.77% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
73.88%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 73.88% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
88.03%
Dividend/share CAGR of 88.03% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
40.38%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 40.38% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
36.61%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 36.61% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-2.29%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
4.58%
Inventory growth of 4.58% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-4.42%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
0.99%
BV/share growth of 0.99% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-3.24%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-55.74%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-10.57%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.