205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.68%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 3.09%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
9.32%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.56%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
43.39%
EBIT growth of 43.39% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
33.50%
Operating income growth of 33.50% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
15.24%
Net income growth of 15.24% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
20.00%
EPS growth of 20.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
20.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 20.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
45.37%
Share change of 45.37% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
42.90%
Diluted share change of 42.90% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-33.23%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-24.69%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-19.83%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-33.03%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 48.64%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-57.43%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 37.29%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-63.08%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 13.07%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.86%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-46.80%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
12.76%
Net income/share CAGR of 12.76% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
-27.94%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-56.65%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
115.41%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 29.18% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
42.97%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 17.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
6.40%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 2.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
29.25%
Dividend/share CAGR of 29.25% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
-1.57%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-33.25%
Dividend reductions while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-2.35%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
8.42%
Inventory growth of 8.42% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
6.96%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.46%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-25.51%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-1.07%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-3.44%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
5.47%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.