205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.31%
Revenue growth of 2.31% vs. zero growth in Technology. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
3.64%
Gross profit growth of 3.64% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
12.92%
EBIT growth of 12.92% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
10.33%
Operating income growth of 10.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
34.92%
Net income growth of 34.92% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
33.33%
EPS growth of 33.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
33.33%
Diluted EPS growth of 33.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-29.56%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-27.87%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
41.96%
Dividend growth of 41.96% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-48.82%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-112.03%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
3.06%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Technology median of 57.98%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
-24.01%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 45.51%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-27.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 14.64%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-52.04%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
385.77%
3Y OCF/share growth of 385.77% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
143.28%
Net income/share CAGR of 143.28% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
73.69%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 40.00%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
48.33%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 7.04%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
145.52%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 145.52% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
49.68%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 49.68% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
83.48%
Dividend/share CAGR of 83.48% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
77.18%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 77.18% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
-2.22%
Dividend reductions while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
7.14%
AR growth of 7.14% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
3.72%
Inventory growth of 3.72% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-1.20%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
45.27%
BV/share growth of 45.27% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-3.48%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
10.68%
R&D growth of 10.68% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-1.52%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.