PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-16.40%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-29.55%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is -0.27%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-62.46%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-62.46%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-63.67%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is -4.75%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-65.79%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is -4.55%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-64.86%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is -6.25%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
2.06%
Share change of 2.06% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-12.19%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-2.02%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-81.83%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-145.60%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
9.31%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Technology median of 93.76%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
-19.03%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 35.02%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
1.93%
3Y revenue/share growth below 50% of Technology median of 14.56%. Jim Chanos would suspect a significant short-term erosion in competitiveness.
72.96%
OCF/share CAGR of 72.96% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
241.61%
OCF/share CAGR of 241.61% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
333.18%
3Y OCF/share growth of 333.18% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
403.33%
Net income/share CAGR of 403.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
20.89%
Net income/share CAGR of 20.89% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
1743.73%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 1743.73% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
305.24%
Equity/share CAGR of 305.24% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
163.29%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 163.29% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
91.82%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 12.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
5.40%
Dividend/share CAGR of 5.40% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
-0.94%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-1.13%
Dividend reductions while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-11.62%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-4.30%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-2.70%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
1.20%
BV/share growth of 1.20% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-6.60%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
1.13%
R&D growth of 1.13% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-13.22%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.