PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.14%
Revenue growth of 2.14% vs. zero growth in Technology. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
12.09%
Gross profit growth of 12.09% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
128.36%
EBIT growth of 128.36% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
128.36%
Operating income growth of 128.36% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
119.86%
Net income growth of 119.86% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
119.44%
EPS growth of 119.44% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
119.44%
Diluted EPS growth of 119.44% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
2.54%
Share change of 2.54% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
2.54%
Diluted share change of 2.54% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
0.23%
Dividend growth of 0.23% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-73.66%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-87.40%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
1.63%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Technology median of 28.18%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
-6.45%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-22.48%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
64.62%
OCF/share CAGR of 64.62% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
506.54%
OCF/share CAGR of 506.54% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-52.39%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
26.17%
Net income/share CAGR of 26.17% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
892.78%
Net income/share CAGR of 892.78% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
-72.86%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
363.72%
Equity/share CAGR of 363.72% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
67.55%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 67.55% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
-6.45%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
46.91%
Dividend/share CAGR of 46.91% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
4.65%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 4.65% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
3.23%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 3.23% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
12.16%
AR growth of 12.16% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
11.65%
Inventory growth of 11.65% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-1.93%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-2.52%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-20.32%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-0.97%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
4.51%
SG&A growth of 4.51% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.