PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.92%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-2.87%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-1.68%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-1.68%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-2.71%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.18%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-3.45%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
25.02%
Dividend growth of 25.02% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-7.05%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-9.93%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
66.42%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 23.10%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
96.86%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 39.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
41.72%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 19.11%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
241.13%
OCF/share CAGR of 241.13% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
127.23%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.08%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
37.02%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Technology median of 11.48%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
401.02%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 30.29% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
252.29%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 83.06%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
93.61%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 20.13%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
91.65%
Equity/share CAGR of 91.65% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
10.40%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 1.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
-4.05%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 4.65%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
361.20%
Dividend/share CAGR of 361.20% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
355.42%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 355.42% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
294.10%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 294.10% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-13.89%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-2.21%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-7.70%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-7.50%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.09%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-1.63%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.