PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.95%
Revenue growth 50-75% of Technology median of 3.30%. Guy Spier would worry if the firm is losing market share.
1.45%
Gross profit growth 75-90% of Technology median of 1.73%. John Neff would watch if higher volumes can lift margins eventually.
-0.33%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-0.33%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 1.35%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
0.90%
Net income growth of 0.90% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
1.79%
EPS growth of 1.79% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
1.82%
Diluted EPS growth of 1.82% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-0.94%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.17%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-1.03%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
22.29%
OCF growth of 22.29% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
10.25%
FCF growth of 10.25% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
163.00%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.55%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
25.66%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
17.83%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.90%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
66.82%
OCF/share CAGR of 66.82% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
32.66%
OCF/share CAGR of 32.66% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
38.83%
3Y OCF/share growth of 38.83% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
628.47%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 43.22% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
-62.18%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 18.42%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
30.50%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 19.75%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
33.35%
Equity/share CAGR of 33.35% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
14.54%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 14.54% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
24.70%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 24.70% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
528.07%
Dividend/share CAGR of 528.07% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
328.75%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 328.75% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
29.76%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 29.76% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
6.63%
AR growth of 6.63% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
5.01%
Inventory growth of 5.01% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
28.46%
Asset growth of 28.46% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
4.09%
BV/share growth of 4.09% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.47%
R&D growth of 0.47% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
3.79%
SG&A growth of 3.79% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.