PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.35%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.23%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
8.67%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.08%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
19.59%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.58%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
19.65%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
20.94%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.82%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
22.22%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.48%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
22.58%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.48%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
-1.03%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.10%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-0.21%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
78.45%
OCF growth of 78.45% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
84.17%
FCF growth of 84.17% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
75.81%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 18.57%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
43.93%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 21.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
9.01%
3Y revenue/share growth near Technology median of 9.52%. Charlie Munger would note typical industry expansions over the short term.
139.61%
OCF/share CAGR of 139.61% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
96.33%
OCF/share CAGR of 96.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
31.16%
3Y OCF/share growth of 31.16% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
139.45%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 58.84% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
81.78%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median. Mohnish Pabrai would check that top-line growth and share count management both contribute.
48.33%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 19.06%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
32.52%
Equity/share CAGR of 32.52% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
31.35%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 2.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
2.49%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos worries about inadequate short-term profitability or repeated asset impairments.
1346.20%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1346.20% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
173.68%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 173.68% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
132.62%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 132.62% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-3.27%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
0.40%
Inventory growth of 0.40% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
0.51%
Asset growth 50-75% of Technology median. Guy Spier sees potential underinvestment or overcaution vs. peers.
1.09%
75-90% of Technology median. John Neff calls for higher ROE or more effective capital usage to match peers.
-0.06%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-4.87%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-1.91%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.