PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.10%
Revenue growth of 6.10% vs. zero growth in Technology. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
6.17%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
15.50%
EBIT growth of 15.50% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
15.25%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
14.66%
Net income growth of 14.66% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
16.67%
EPS growth of 16.67% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
16.92%
Diluted EPS growth of 16.92% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-1.40%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.52%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-0.30%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
71.83%
OCF growth of 71.83% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
82.73%
FCF growth of 82.73% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
52.13%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 17.41%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
6.46%
5Y revenue/share growth 50-75% of Technology median of 12.14%. Guy Spier might worry about slower mid-term expansions vs. peers.
12.10%
3Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 10.13%. Mohnish Pabrai would attribute it to strong near-term market positioning.
48.23%
OCF/share CAGR of 48.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
24.14%
OCF/share CAGR of 24.14% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
29.91%
3Y OCF/share growth of 29.91% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
101.43%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 50.33% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
7.87%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median. Mohnish Pabrai would check that top-line growth and share count management both contribute.
12.80%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of Technology median. John Neff would seek cost or revenue improvements to match peers.
33.75%
Equity/share CAGR of 33.75% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
16.21%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median. Mohnish Pabrai might see disciplined retention of earnings behind outperformance.
-3.10%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 7.33%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
2216987.49%
Dividend/share CAGR of 2216987.49% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
182.59%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 182.59% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
98.80%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 98.80% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
3.28%
AR growth of 3.28% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-6.05%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-5.66%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-0.92%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.03%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-15.40%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-1.25%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-7.66%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.