PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.68%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is -3.57%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-2.25%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is -3.11%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-16.28%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is -7.38%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-15.24%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is -10.28%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-14.95%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is -11.82%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-12.50%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is -10.49%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-13.75%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is -10.48%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.46%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.88%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-0.31%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-61.75%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-66.59%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
42.07%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 22.81%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
2.81%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
14.67%
3Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 9.84%. Mohnish Pabrai would attribute it to strong near-term market positioning.
54.64%
OCF/share CAGR of 54.64% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
22.90%
OCF/share CAGR of 22.90% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
67.10%
3Y OCF/share growth of 67.10% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
91.38%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 16.66% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
23.77%
Net income/share CAGR of 23.77% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
116.01%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 1.13%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
37.06%
Equity/share CAGR of 37.06% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
7.25%
5Y equity/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median. Guy Spier sees subpar net worth creation vs. competitors.
-1.77%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 9.88%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
1156.44%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1156.44% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
190.22%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 190.22% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
81.56%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 81.56% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
8.93%
AR growth of 8.93% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
6.74%
Inventory growth of 6.74% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-3.35%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-1.19%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is -0.48%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-0.05%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
5.23%
R&D growth of 5.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
8.89%
SG&A growth of 8.89% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.