PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.04%
Positive revenue growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
0.29%
Positive gross profit growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
0.32%
Positive EBIT growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
-0.96%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is -5.63%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
297.09%
Net income growth of 297.09% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
294.29%
EPS growth of 294.29% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
297.06%
Diluted EPS growth of 297.06% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-0.20%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.20%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
0.20%
Dividend growth of 0.20% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-42.35%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-45.64%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
56.33%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 27.73%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
47.90%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 22.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
27.80%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 13.01%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
134.19%
OCF/share CAGR of 134.19% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
247.85%
OCF/share CAGR of 247.85% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
94.00%
3Y OCF/share growth of 94.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
178.55%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 45.19% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
324.95%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 30.60%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
121.24%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 17.08%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
45.75%
Equity/share CAGR of 45.75% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
9.43%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects weak profitability or questionable capital allocation limiting equity growth.
9.04%
3Y equity/share CAGR 75-90% of Technology median. John Neff calls for overhead or margin tweaks to keep pace with peers.
520.16%
Dividend/share CAGR of 520.16% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
196.58%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 196.58% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
82.35%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 82.35% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
13.77%
Slight AR growth while Technology cuts AR. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm is missing an opportunity to collect faster or if peers face sales declines.
3.83%
Inventory growth of 3.83% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-0.77%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
3.16%
BV/share growth of 3.16% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
0.02%
Debt growth of 0.02% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-0.26%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
5.87%
SG&A growth of 5.87% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.