PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.31%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is -3.36%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-6.07%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is -3.67%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-8.06%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is -8.06%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-9.04%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is -9.63%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-1.78%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is -9.31%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.79%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is -8.46%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-1.47%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.44%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-0.16%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-48.39%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-53.02%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
133.94%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 34.74%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
38.70%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 19.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
28.08%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 14.07%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
498.85%
OCF/share CAGR of 498.85% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
175.85%
OCF/share CAGR of 175.85% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
116.94%
3Y OCF/share growth of 116.94% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
9620.45%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 53.24% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
187.69%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 12.81%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
83.48%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 20.84%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
25.60%
Equity/share CAGR of 25.60% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
-7.65%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 22.32%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-6.64%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 16.82%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
597.21%
Dividend/share CAGR of 597.21% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
156.46%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 156.46% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
102.64%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 102.64% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
19.30%
Slight AR growth while Technology cuts AR. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm is missing an opportunity to collect faster or if peers face sales declines.
-3.88%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
1.79%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.22%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-3.87%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
21.41%
Debt growth of 21.41% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-2.75%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.