PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.63%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is -3.54%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-0.43%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is -2.41%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-2.53%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-0.40%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is -1.97%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
9.72%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
10.53%
EPS growth of 10.53% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
10.71%
Diluted EPS growth of 10.71% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-0.21%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.53%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
0.21%
Dividend growth of 0.21% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-51.48%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-56.63%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
37.56%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 19.20%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
18.56%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 8.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
4.90%
3Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 3.94%. Mohnish Pabrai would attribute it to strong near-term market positioning.
58.74%
OCF/share CAGR of 58.74% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
56.76%
OCF/share CAGR of 56.76% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
14.75%
3Y OCF/share growth of 14.75% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
136.30%
Net income/share CAGR of 136.30% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
100.76%
Net income/share CAGR of 100.76% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
26.23%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 26.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
4.46%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos might suspect fundamental issues limiting equity creation over a decade.
-16.33%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 14.80%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-22.07%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 10.78%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
647.52%
Dividend/share CAGR of 647.52% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
165.01%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 165.01% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
80.30%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 80.30% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
22.53%
Slight AR growth while Technology cuts AR. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm is missing an opportunity to collect faster or if peers face sales declines.
0.10%
Inventory growth of 0.10% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-4.08%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-12.98%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is -0.10%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
6.76%
Debt growth of 6.76% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-2.33%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
1.21%
SG&A growth of 1.21% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.