PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.70%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-0.29%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
4.57%
EBIT growth of 4.57% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
-1.29%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
17.55%
Net income growth of 17.55% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
19.84%
EPS growth of 19.84% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
19.35%
Diluted EPS growth of 19.35% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-1.61%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.70%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-0.54%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
102.12%
OCF growth of 102.12% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
130.43%
FCF growth of 130.43% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
22.18%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 9.83%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
13.14%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 6.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
-4.83%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.74%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
303.61%
OCF/share CAGR of 303.61% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
136.80%
OCF/share CAGR of 136.80% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
103.54%
3Y OCF/share growth of 103.54% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
136.66%
Net income/share CAGR of 136.66% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
123.84%
Net income/share CAGR of 123.84% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
41.81%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 41.81% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
3.34%
Equity/share CAGR of 3.34% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
-15.44%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-22.54%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 2.38%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
638.34%
Dividend/share CAGR of 638.34% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
162.46%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 162.46% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
79.33%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 79.33% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-10.64%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
6.64%
Inventory growth of 6.64% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
0.94%
Asset growth of 0.94% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
0.45%
BV/share growth of 0.45% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
3.76%
Debt growth of 3.76% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
0.53%
R&D growth of 0.53% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-3.84%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.