PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.79%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 5.85%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if this gap is sustainable or cyclical.
7.87%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 5.43%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if economies of scale justify the premium growth.
20.72%
EBIT growth of 20.72% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
12.68%
Operating income growth of 12.68% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
24.76%
Net income growth of 24.76% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
24.49%
EPS growth of 24.49% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
24.14%
Diluted EPS growth of 24.14% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.22%
Share change of 0.22% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.32%
Diluted share change of 0.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
13.33%
Dividend growth of 13.33% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
47.26%
OCF growth of 47.26% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
47.49%
FCF growth of 47.49% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
47.46%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 16.70%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
40.65%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 13.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
16.50%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 6.78%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
120.33%
OCF/share CAGR of 120.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
63.52%
OCF/share CAGR of 63.52% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
18.07%
3Y OCF/share growth of 18.07% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
128.52%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 18.89% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
122.19%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 24.07%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
425.94%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 9.52%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
12.26%
Equity/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median. Guy Spier sees subpar expansion vs. peers’ net worth growth.
1.64%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects weak profitability or questionable capital allocation limiting equity growth.
-4.74%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 14.31%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
681.02%
Dividend/share CAGR of 681.02% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
167.12%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 167.12% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
64.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 64.37% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
1.58%
AR growth of 1.58% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-5.65%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
6.28%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.10%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
10.11%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
4.74%
Debt growth of 4.74% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
0.52%
R&D growth of 0.52% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-2.21%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.