205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.40%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.58%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
5.54%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.19%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
-2.20%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.06%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-2.95%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 2.65%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
1.99%
Net income growth of 1.99% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
1.65%
EPS growth of 1.65% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
1.67%
Diluted EPS growth of 1.67% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.22%
Share growth above Technology median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.22%
Diluted share change of 0.22% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-0.05%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
54.47%
OCF growth of 54.47% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
319.48%
FCF growth of 319.48% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
36.34%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 29.41%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if consistent reinvestment or product expansions drive this gap.
7.05%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
-15.54%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 12.68%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
138.05%
OCF/share CAGR of 138.05% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-10.13%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-25.04%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
93.78%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 27.03% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
-11.27%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 23.46%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-40.93%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 3.80%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
93.15%
Equity/share CAGR of 93.15% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
108.41%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 9.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
56.21%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 8.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
330.83%
Dividend/share CAGR of 330.83% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
68.63%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 68.63% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
27.31%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 27.31% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
2.39%
AR growth of 2.39% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
0.56%
Inventory growth of 0.56% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
0.47%
Asset growth of 0.47% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
1.14%
BV/share growth of 1.14% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-2.10%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
4.18%
R&D growth of 4.18% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
2.20%
SG&A growth of 2.20% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.